AirSeatmap
  • Startseite
  • Airlines
AirSeatmap
  • Airlines
  • United
  • Bombardier CRJ700 (CR7)

Sitzplan Bombardier CRJ700 (CR7) United

Flugzeug Bombardier CRJ700 (CR7) United mit 3 Klassen und 70 Sitzen an Bord. Dank dem Flugzeug-Sitzplan können Sie herausfinden, welche Plätze komfortabler sind und welche am besten vermieden werden sollten.
Tippen Sie auf den Sitz auf der Karte, um die Details anzuzeigen.
Sitzplan Bombardier CRJ700 (CR7) UnitedSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSunSun
Sitzplan-Daten von Seatmap.org bereitgestellt
Ausstattung
  • Entertainment-System
  • Wi-Fi

Angaben zu Sitzplätzen

KlasseSitzabstandBreiteReiheSitze
First Class
Recliner
37191-26
Economy Extra
Standardsitz
34177-9, 1816
Economy
Standardsitz
3016-1710-2348

Bewertungen

9/15/2019, sitz 21D

My favorite thing about the CRJs is the legroom. Only con is that I have to lean my head down a little bit to look out the window (I'm 5' 10'').

7/9/2019, sitz 2A

Excellent first class seat for this short flight. Service was good, just a snack and drink. The seat is comfortable and large. However, no overhead space on the A side of the aircraft.

5/3/2019, sitz 18A

Window seats in exit row are located between windows. Seat pitch is approximately 36”.

12/15/2018, sitz 21A

Windows are misaligned after the emergency exit rows. To see out of this window, you must lean far forward, and that's also the case for seats in rows 19-22. I don't know why the windows are so far apart on this plane. It feels much more cramped than an Embraer 170 or 190.

11/21/2018, sitz 22B

Beware! This seat 22 A/B, the flight's CRJ-700 aircraft overhead is used for it's required equipment storage. i.e. emergency equip. Highly advise against it, unless you can use row forward's seat overhead's! Good luck with that!

10/28/2018, sitz 17D

Will never fly United again. First time, last time. TSA was not put on ticket!!! Seriously? No HC wheelchair upon arrival at destination. No pre-boarding priority given to me/recovering from knee replacement. Had to climb stairs to board. No pre-warning! Seat was like sitting on a plank of wood. Killed my sciatica. Popcorn on floor; overhead light was MINIMAL, bulb looked like it was failing. Only had two 'snack boxes' available for purchase. I got the classic, my daughter got the cheese one. Cabin EXTREMELY cold, after several complaints from passengers, heat turned on so high it was insane. Couldn't connect to WiFi. Carry ons thrown around like garbage when deplaning. Utter confusion deplaning due to carry on procedure - lack thereof. Disorganized/unprofessional. Yall should take a page from SW - they treat their customers with concern/professionalism and expertise. HAVE to use you for return to MD. God help us!

10/20/2018, sitz 18D

This seat has fantastic legroom, especially for such a small plane.

9/19/2017, sitz 2A

Seat 2A is the best in this cabin. Other row 2 seats are good as well. With the reduced overhead bin space, row 2 affords some precious [underseat] storage space unavailable to row 1. The person in row 1 had the seat reclined the entire flight and it didn't seem "In my face" at all. Typically I try to avoid RJ's when possible but this seat was perfectly fine on par with mainline jets.

7/1/2017, sitz 7A

Lots of legroom in this seat. Under-seat storage is a little hard to reach, but more source than first.

6/17/2017, sitz 2D

This is a perfectly pleasant seat; comfortable, quiet, and the service on short flights is good.

5/3/2017, sitz 9d

In the past week I've flown in seats 8D & 9D (both Economy Plus) and 15C & 12A (regular economy). Each flight was 25-50 minutes and for trips that short this plane is fine. It's surprisingly quiet. I don't think Economy Plus is worth it unless you can get Row 7 or 18 - those really do have additional space, but rows 8 and 9 aren't noticeably better than regular economy. All of the seats are relatively uncomfortable and the pockets in the seats in front of you are too small to be useful - even a bottle of water was too big. The overhead bins are too small to hold much, so many bags (and all rollers, I believe) have to be gate checked - except that rather than checking it through to your final destination, United makes you wait and get them back near the jetway, which is something to consider if you have a tight connection to make.

1/30/2017, sitz 12C

Avoid the CRJ when possible. United's gate check process is an absolute mess. On arrival, you have to wait10 minutes in a cold jetway (it didn't help that IND has a fan blowing cold air at the base of it) for the ground crew to bring the bags up one at a time. Thankfully I was near the door, so I could easily see and get to my bag, but those stuck halfway up the jetway had to navigate the mess of people and bags. Also, this seat is crap. Narrower than those in the E175 and the tray table sits on your legs.

12/7/2016, sitz 17B

It was my first flight ever so didn't know what to expect. Having had recent hip surgery i was expecting to be a bit uncomfortable.But had lots of legroom and was very comfortable. Being the plane was only half full i was offered to sit the row behind that had a bit more leg room but was fine where i was. After flying bigger planes i did realize the noise level was fairly high but not really that bad. Would have no problem flying in this airplane again.

5/9/2016, sitz 19D

I sat in 19D and the view out was impeccable. I got a clear view out and was able to view the wing up cloase.

4/29/2016, sitz 16D

In spite of an excellent ground crew at Minneapolis, this plane (Bombardier CRJ-700 V2) has a basic flaw for flights of 900 nautical miles or further (i.e., Minneapolis to Houston, about ): if the flight plan requires additional fuel, it must reduce the number of passengers due to weight. In our instance on April 29, weather required a longer flight plan from Houston to Minneapolis. The crew announced that due to the added weight of fuel, the full plane would have to be reduced by 15 passengers. This occurred while the tanker truck was en route to add fuel to the plane. The delays cause by deplaning and waiting for the fuel truck added more than an hour to departure time. The change in flight plan (longer, hence more fuel needed) resulted in a 2.5 hour flight becoming a 4 hour flight. Needless to say, this caused many missed connections in Houston. In addition, the other comments here are correct: overhead bin space is much less than most commercial jets. I only bring one carry on, a backpack, which fits in United's demonstration carry on stands at the gate. It also fits in the overhead bin on Embraers, other Bombardier/Canada Jets, Airbus, Boeing, etc., even the Saabs on Caribbean routes. But not on this plane. This flight is about 908 miles "as the crow flies". After following the vectors in the flight plan it's somewhat longer. United, rationally, is trying to use this equipment to save fuel and reduce the cost per mile/per passenger. But United, irrationally, is using a plane for this route that cannot carry both a full fuel load and a full passenger load in the event of a changed flight plan. Avoid this plane entirely if you can if the flight is close to 1000 miles. Make note of the plane used when you look for reservations. I will be flying the same plane to Denver tomorrow (about 608 nautical miles), but the lack of overhead bin space will cause me to avoid the United routes that use this plane. Other than that, the comments here are generally correct, but I would just expect cramped seating, and try to avoid it on flights more than 60 - 90 minutes. That's just the economics of the air travel industry at the moment. Again, the ground crew, and United's employees in general, have been very good. But this particular plane on routes like this will drive flyers of longer distances to other airlines.

3/19/2016, sitz 10A

Personally I felt like I had plenty of leg room on this flight. It wasn't full but I felt comfortable.

11/16/2015, sitz First

The CRJ-700 have comfortable First Class seats but they are the seats that are the farthest from the restrooms. This makes it an issue when the plane is full on a long flight and a line starts forming in the back plus you have to maneuver the serving cart along the way.

11/15/2015, sitz negative

This flight(LAX to SAT) is a stretch for the comfort this aircraft affords. Economy Plus is a expensive joke. Other than additional legroom, the narrow cabin presses one against the wall of the aircraft if the occupant has a window seat.

11/15/2015, sitz 19D

Just flew this plane on a round trip between CMH and IAD. My chief complaints are pretty much the same. The seat has zero cushion and the way the seats are setup especially in 19 and 20 (where I was) you are between two windows with nothing to see out, I found this less than enjoyable. Other than that, I didn't have too many other issues with the aircraft. Granted I was only on it for a very short flight (45 min barely enough time to even drink a beverage).

6/12/2015, sitz 8A

6/12/15, IAD -> DAY. Economy Plus legroom was wonderful. As others have noted, Economy seats on this plane are somewhat lacking in padding ... my butt was sore after only an hour-plus flight. While moving the magazine and safety card to a slot above the tray theoretically makes more space for personal items in the pocket underneath, on this plane the pocket is so small I could barely stash my phone and a bottle of water. Window was a little far forward for optimal visibility.

Airline Flotte

  • Airbus A319 v1 128 Sitze
  • Airbus A319 v2 126 Sitze
  • Airbus A320 150 Sitze
  • Boeing 737-700 v1 126 Sitze
  • Boeing 737-700 v2 126 Sitze
  • Boeing 737-800 (738) v1 166 Sitze
  • Boeing 737-800 (738) v2 166 Sitze
  • Boeing 737-800 (738) v3 166 Sitze
  • Boeing 737-900 (739) v1 179 Sitze
  • Boeing 737-900 (739) v2 179 Sitze
  • Boeing 737-900 (739) v3 179 Sitze
  • Boeing 737 MAX (7M8) 179 Sitze
  • Boeing 757-200 (752) v1 169 Sitze
  • Boeing 757-200 (752) v2 142 Sitze
  • Boeing 757-200 (752) v3 176 Sitze
  • Boeing 757-300 234 Sitze
  • Boeing 767-300ER 4 Class 167 Sitze
  • Boeing 767-300ER v1 214 Sitze
  • Boeing 767-300ER v2 214 Sitze
  • Boeing 767-400ER 240 Sitze
  • Boeing 777-200 (777) v1 269 Sitze
  • Boeing 777-200 (777) v2 267 Sitze
  • Boeing 777-200 (777) v3 364 Sitze
  • Boeing 777-200 (777) v4 364 Sitze
  • Boeing 777-200 (777) v5 276 Sitze
  • Boeing 777-300ER (77W) 350 Sitze
  • Boeing 787-10 318 Sitze
  • Boeing 787-8 (788) 3 Class 219 Sitze
  • Boeing 787-8 (788) 4 Class 243 Sitze
  • Boeing 787-9 (789) 252 Sitze
  • Bombardier CRJ200 (CR2) 50 Sitze
  • Bombardier CRJ550 50 Sitze
  • Bombardier CRJ700 (CR7) 70 Sitze
  • Embraer E145 (ER4) 50 Sitze
  • Embraer E170 70 Sitze
  • Embraer E175 (E75) v1 76 Sitze
  • Embraer E175 (E75) v2 70 Sitze
  • Datenschutzerklärung
  • Nutzungsbedingungen
  • Kontakt aufnehmen
  • deDeutsch
    • ruРусский
    • enEnglish
    • esEspanol
AirSeatmap
Copyright © AirSeatmap, 2025